This is exactly what the store aims to solve though, no? Developers don't need to deal with creating manual installers an instead only need to provide their application. I can imaging one of them is always going to have an earlier version upgrade/update compared to the other. Providing both the app and the manual program installer is a huge tasks for developers. With the new store and microsoft taking a 0% revenue cut for third party payment services, there's essentially no reason for a developer not to publish their app there. Makes it easier to search for software in a single place with categories/tags.Ĭurrenly the only disadvantage is the lack of applications actually published to it. Has a very easy installation processes, you don't have to deal with wizards and shady tactics. Uses universal standards for packaging applications. Is more secure, manually curated, displays permissions. What's the point of installing them through the Microsoft Store instead of downloading them manually? All of these programs have a dedicated installer provided by the developers.
Take Spotify, Discord or Zoom for example.
0 kommentar(er)
